I confess that I’m not an avid reader of much of what gets
churned out in the business press by the so-called experts. I readily admit
that this is somewhat of a contradiction in me, because I want people to read
what I write about in my area of expertise, but let’s face it, there’s a lot of
crud out there. Most business writers seem to approach their subject as if it
were the key component to business success. If their readers would simply
follow their cookbook formula, everything would be peachy. If only life were so
simple. So I tend to restrict my reading to The Wall Street Journal, The New
York Times, The Economist and a few other assorted publications.
One of the other assorted publications I tend to pay
attention to is the McKinsey Quarterly, and it is an article there that spurs
me to write today. The article, which was published early in October, 2013, is
entitled “How B2B companies talk past their customers” and it examines the gap
between the messages that suppliers send to their customers and what their
customers really want to know. The article struck me as particularly germane to
investor relations because, stripped to its bare essentials, IR is a
business-to-business marketing effort where companies present the reasons to
own their stock to sophisticated purchasing managers who are interested in
buying a commodity that will benefit their customers, such as mutual fund investors
or pension managers.
The article, which is available at http://www.mckinsey.com/insights,
looked at how companies in the business-to-business sector positioned their
brands and came up with a list of 13 broad themes and topic areas ranging from
the practical (low prices) to the lofty (corporate social responsibility). Then
the authors turned around and asked customers how important they thought each
theme was in evaluating the brand. What they found was that there was an almost
complete mismatch between what companies were saying and what customers thought
was important.
This piece of research is instructive to investor relations
because IR departments are formulating brand messages all the time, whether
it’s in an investor presentation or an annual report, yet in my experience, the
vast majority of all such messages are put together based upon what the company
wants to say, not what investors want to hear.
So here’s a radical thought. The next time you put together
a presentation, stop and think about what investors want and need to hear. This
shouldn’t be terribly difficult, as IR departments are constantly bombarded by
questions from analysts and good investor relations practice dictates that you
should track the types of questions being asked. The data should be there – you
simply have to integrate it into your message.
At the end of the day, it comes down to a relatively simple
rule of communications – know your audience. Unfortunately, it is a rule that
is often overlooked when polishing IR presentations and annual reports.
No comments:
Post a Comment